We continue with the latest tablet from Teclast as the protagonist, which is undoubtedly one of the chinese tablets interesting things we've seen lately, to face it today in our comparative, with another tablet that is also quite recent and of a high level, although a little smaller, but also more affordable. Which of the two can be more worthwhile for you ?: Teclast T10 vs Cube Freer X9.
Designer
Regarding the design, we find two tablets that can boast of arriving, despite their price, with high-end details, and not only with regard to their metal casings. It is true, from an aesthetic point of view, that the lines of the tablet of Teclast They are somewhat more stylized, and this one also has a fingerprint reader, but the CubeOn the other hand, it has in its favor having a USB Type-C port.
Dimensions
We have already warned at the beginning that the Freer X9 It has a smaller screen and this, logically, is noticeable when comparing its dimensions (23,90 x 16,70 cm against 22,7 x 14,4 cm), although even more than the difference in size draws attention to that of weight (553 grams against 366 grams). In thickness, however, they are practically tied (8 mm against 10 mm).
Screen
The screen size difference is just over an inch (10.1 inches against 8.9 inches), and although the Freer X9 is somewhat larger than a normal compact, we must bear in mind that it is a difference that we are going to notice quite a bit. In the rest, they are much closer: with the two we will enjoy the highest resolution (2560 x 1600) and both use the 16:10 aspect ratio (optimized for video playback).
Unlimited
In the performance section, the tablet of Teclast, because they both have 4 GB of RAM memory and mount Mediatek processors, but theirs is higher, although their frequency is somewhat lower (MT8176 six core to 1,7 GHz against MT8173 quad core to 2,0 GHz). It is also a point in its favor to arrive with Android Nougat, because the darkest point of the Freer X9 It is definitely the stay in Android Marshmallow.
Storage capacity
Yes we have an absolute tie in the section of storage capacity, with 64 GB of internal memory expandable through micro-SD in both cases. For Android tablets, it goes without saying that they are truly impressive numbers.
Cameras
We also have great cameras in either of the two tablets, much better than most of us you will probably need, although in this case it is possible to tip the balance on the side of the Teclast tablet a bit, because although the rear is of 13 SM in both cases, your front camera is even better (8 SM against 5 SM). Taking into account that the Freer X9 There is already plenty in this section, in any case, we would not recommend to an average user to give much importance to this advantage.
Autonomy
The fact that there is such a notable difference in the size of their respective screens makes it even more difficult than usual to place bets in favor of one or the other in terms of autonomy. The only thing we can say for sure is that the Teclast T10 advantageous part thanks to a battery with a much higher capacity (8100 mAh against 5500 mAh), but it must be borne in mind that what is expected is that its consumption is higher as well.
Teclast T10 vs Cube X9 Freer: final balance of the comparison and price
In general, it would be necessary to give as the winner, as far as technical specifications are concerned, the Teclast T10, but it must be taken into account that the advantage is minimal in many sections and that, in return, the Freer X9 It will be much cheaper for us: while the first is found by prices that rise from 200 Euros, the second can be found for just over 150 Euros.
What exactly are we sacrificing if we bet on the tablet of Cube? We would say that there are above all two points to take into account (another, such as cameras, can be overlooked more): first, that the screen is significantly smaller (whether it is an advantage or a disadvantage depends on what we are looking for) and, second, that we have an inferior processor and that it does not have Android Nougat, so its performance is going to be a little behind.